1. 7%和28.6%只有在不使用剩余名额时才有意义,对于剩余名额分配不适用7%和28.6%原则,某些不断重复7%的ID可以歇一会了。说明看这里:http://bbs.legalimmigrant.org/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=906
2. 剩余名额先给EB1,这个大家都没反对意见。说明看这里:http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Immigration/31262131.html
3. 剩余名额给过EB1后是应该先给EB2再给EB3 还是 同时给EB2 EB3?也就是该Horizontal spillover 还是混合spillover的问题上大家在抠字眼(纯垂直spillover对于中国EB2,EB3都没好处,一个剩余名额都拿不到,大家就不要傻乎乎地支持了)。对于这一点,冰机灵icecream08 同学说:
ACT203 says:EB3 can get "any visas not required for EB1 and EB2"
It doesn't say: EB3 can get "any visas not required for EB1 plus any visas
not reqired for EB2".
When talking about legal wording, do those two have the same meaning?
When I read ACT203, my understanding is EB1->EB2->EB3, unless ACT203 changes the wording specify: "any visas not required for EB1 plus any visas not reqired for EB2".
来源:未名空间(www.mitbbs.cn)